我很好奇我的例子中&mut *transaction
和&mut transaction
之间有什么区别,因为我一开始并不认为transaction
是指针,但出于某种原因,&mut *transaction
满足trait 约束,而&mut transaction
则不满足trait 约束.
这是我的工作代码:
use sqlx::{PgPool, Transaction, Executor};
use chrono::{DateTime, Utc};
pub struct SimpleDbClient {
db: PgPool,
}
pub trait AddCharacterEntries {
async fn insert_character_entries(&self, timestamp: DateTime<Utc>, char_values: Vec<(char, i32)>) -> sqlx::Result<()>;
}
impl AddCharacterEntries for SimpleDbClient {
async fn insert_character_entries(&self, timestamp: DateTime<Utc>, char_values: Vec<(char, i32)>) -> sqlx::Result<()> {
let mut transaction = self.db.begin().await?;
for (character, ascii_value) in char_values {
sqlx::query!(
r#"
INSERT INTO character_log (timestamp, character, ascii_value)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3)
"#,
timestamp,
character as char,
ascii_value
)
.execute(&mut *transaction)
.await?;
}
transaction.commit().await?;
Ok(())
}
}
如果我将上面的更改为.execute(&mut transaction)
,我会得到这个错误:
rustc: the trait bound `&mut sqlx::Transaction<'_, sqlx::Postgres>: sqlx::Executor<'_>` is not satisfied
the following other types implement trait `sqlx::Executor<'c>`:
<&'c mut sqlx::PgConnection as sqlx::Executor<'c>>
<&'c mut sqlx::sqlx_postgres::PgListener as sqlx::Executor<'c>>
<&'c mut sqlx::AnyConnection as sqlx::Executor<'c>>
<&sqlx::Pool<DB> as sqlx::Executor<'p>> [E0277]
rustc: required by a bound introduced by this call [E0277]
这归结为进行某种类型的铸造吗?我很好奇这是否会被认为是一种限制,或者编译器认为这两个表达是不同的对象是否真的有意义.