我会使用命名向量,而不是试图混淆dplyr编程的细微差别.一个好处是这种方法已经矢量化了.
rename_cols <- function(col) {
name = paste0(col, "_new") #I want to be able to parse this into the rename function below
mtcars %>%
rename(setNames(col, name))
}
rename_cols(colnames(mtcars))
# mpg_new cyl_new disp_new hp_new drat_new wt_new qsec_new vs_new am_new gear_new carb_new
# Mazda RX4 21.0 6 160.0 110 3.90 2.620 16.46 0 1 4 4
# Mazda RX4 Wag 21.0 6 160.0 110 3.90 2.875 17.02 0 1 4 4
# Datsun 710 22.8 4 108.0 93 3.85 2.320 18.61 1 1 4 1
# Hornet 4 Drive 21.4 6 258.0 110 3.08 3.215 19.44 1 0 3 1
# Hornet Sportabout 18.7 8 360.0 175 3.15 3.440 17.02 0 0 3 2
# Valiant 18.1 6 225.0 105 2.76 3.460 20.22 1 0 3 1
# ...
编辑
在这种情况下,你可能会发现rename_with()
是你所需要的.
library(dplyr)
colnames(mtcars) -> cols
mtcars %>%
rename_with(~ paste0(., "_new"), any_of(cols))
# which is the same as the more concise but maybe less clear...
mtcars %>%
rename_with(paste0, any_of(cols), "_new")